Page 3 of 3

Re: Barnes Busters

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:17 pm
by bushmeister
My thoughts exactly. Maybe we should at least provide the justification with an email campaign or something. ... I don't know if it would help, but it certainly wouldn't hurt.

Re: Barnes Busters

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:35 pm
by Texas Sheepdawg
wildcatter wrote:
generalist wrote:So who has data with the 325 busters? they appear to be avail now.

thx



I'm up in the north country of MI., so i don't have the data with me, but I did get them going 2100fps and Barnes settled for a load that was doing nearly 2000fps. After working up loads with lil gun and 296, the initial data seemed to favor AA1680. Barnes kilt several mighty fine heavy porkers, in the 400-800 lb class, with this load, reporting stunning results and railed about the safety factor of having quick follow-up shoots..

..t

And here are the pictures of the porkers WC is referring to.
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1634

Re: Barnes Busters

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 7:36 pm
by BamBam
So what ever happened here ?

Any starting load data ever come out ?

Bigger is better and I have lots of 4227 to use up .... :D

ETA> I have other powders to try as well but I have way to much 4227, if it's even possible to have too much powder.... :roll: